Mason v. State

949 So. 2d 1127, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2409, 2007 WL 518771
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mason v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 976 So. 2d 80
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2007·No. No. 3D06-2346·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). Materials provided to this Court by the State do not remedy the trial court’s failure to attach such materials to [1128]*1128its order. Langdon v. State, 947 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), clarifying 31 Fla. L. Weekly D2487 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 4, 2006).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. State, 949 So. 2d 1127, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2409, 2007 WL 518771 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

949 So. 2d 1127 (Mason v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langdon v. State
947 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)