Mason v. Smyk
This text of 42 A.D.2d 887 (Mason v. Smyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application pursuant to CPLR article 78 for relief in the nature of prohibition denied as not being the appropriate remedy in this case (Matter of Lee v. County Court of Erie County, 27 N Y 2d 432, 436-437; icf. Hensley v. Municipal Ct., 411 TJ. S. 345), without prejudice to an application by petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus (see CPLR 7002 [a]) or to an application by the District Attorney or others authorized for relief pursuant to sections 1032 and 1056 of the Family Court Act. Staley, Jr., J. F., Cooke, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 A.D.2d 887, 346 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-smyk-nyappdiv-1973.