Mason v. Rollins
This text of 80 U.S. 602 (Mason v. Rollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
It is manifest that the averments of citizenship in neither *603 of the bills are sufficient to give the Circuit Court jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act of 1789; and all were filed subsequent to the 13th of July, 1866.
When these suits were brought, therefore, there was no act in force giving jurisdiction, in cases such as those made by the records, to the courts of the United States. The Circuit Court was obliged, therefore, to dismiss the bill in each case for want of jurisdiction, and the judgment of that court in the several cases must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 U.S. 602, 20 L. Ed. 527, 13 Wall. 602, 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-rollins-scotus-1872.