Mason v. Rollins

80 U.S. 602, 20 L. Ed. 527, 13 Wall. 602, 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1371
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 29, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is manifest that the averments of citizenship in neither *603 of the bills are sufficient to give the Circuit Court jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act of 1789; and all were filed subsequent to the 13th of July, 1866.

When these suits were brought, therefore, there was no act in force giving jurisdiction, in cases such as those made by the records, to the courts of the United States. The Circuit Court was obliged, therefore, to dismiss the bill in each case for want of jurisdiction, and the judgment of that court in the several cases must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. Rollins, 80 U.S. 602, 20 L. Ed. 527, 13 Wall. 602, 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1371 (1872).

80 U.S. 602 (Mason v. Rollins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Phillips
176 F. 663 (Ninth Circuit, 1910)