Mason v. New York Review Publishing Co.

154 A.D. 651, 139 N.Y.S. 639, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9090
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 3, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 154 A.D. 651 (Mason v. New York Review Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mason v. New York Review Publishing Co., 154 A.D. 651, 139 N.Y.S. 639, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Dowling, J.:

This action is brought to recover damages for the publication of a libel concerning plaintiff in the New York Review. The amended complaint sets forth that the defendants, and each of them, caused to be printed and published the article complained of. This is denied by the .answer of the' respondents herein. An order for their examination has been vacated. While the order might have permitted a wider scope of examination than was proper, plaintiff was undoubtedly entitled to examine the defendants as to the allegations set forth in the paragraphs of the amended complaint numbered “Third” and “Fifth,” for he cannot recover against the individual defendants unless he establishes their connection with the publication complained of, and to ascertain this he is entitled to question them as well as the actual publisher of the libel. He is entitled as well to show, if he can, that defendants knew the article complained of to be false.

[652]*652The order appealed from will, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, and the order for the examination of respondents modified by limiting it to the matters set forth in the paragraphs of the amended complaint numbered “Third” and “Fifth.”

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred. .

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and order for examination modified as stated in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nomako v. Ashton
20 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Roma v. Newspaper Consolidated Corp.
40 Misc. 2d 1085 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Sommers v. New York World-Telegram Corp.
279 A.D. 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Hillick v. Edwards & Son
143 Misc. 277 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)
Gedney v. Planten
90 Misc. 275 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
United States Drainage & Irrigation Co. v. Hawley
166 A.D. 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Guenther v. Ridgway Co.
159 A.D. 74 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 A.D. 651, 139 N.Y.S. 639, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-new-york-review-publishing-co-nyappdiv-1913.