Mason v. McCrory Corp.
This text of 549 So. 2d 1159 (Mason v. McCrory Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee’s argument that the foreign defendant, in this tort action, breached no duty owed to the plaintiff is irrelevant to the issue of long-arm jurisdiction. The allegations that the product causing an injury in this state was manufactured by the defendant and shipped to this state in the ordinary course of commerce, were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss on grounds that the court was without jurisdiction over the defendant-corporation. § 48.193(l)(f)(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). See Ford Motor Co. v. Atwood Vacuum Mach. Co., 392 So.2d 1305 (Fla.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 901, 101 S.Ct. 3024, 69 L.Ed.2d 401 (1981); Kravitz v. Gebrueder Pletscher Druck-Gusswaremfabrik, 442 So.2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 So. 2d 1159, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2371, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5541, 1989 WL 118965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-mccrory-corp-fladistctapp-1989.