Mason v. Matejka
This text of 562 P.2d 169 (Mason v. Matejka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit to determine whether defendant has a roadway easement by prescription across plaintiffs’ land which adjoins the defendant’s property. Defendant appeals from a decree adverse to her. The proceeding being equitable, we review de novo.
The lots involved are on Ten Mile Lake in Coos County, Oregon, known as Oregon Lake Estates plat. Plaintiffs and defendant have summer homes on their property with access either by boat or by the road in question. For many years the road was used for the hauling of logs to the lake, but during the rainy season it was and is inaccessible.
The record reveals a conflict in the testimony between the parties and their respective witnesses as to the usage of the road by the defendant. However, we agree with the trial court that defendant failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that she had a prescriptive right to this road. Boyer v. Abston, 274 Or 161, 544 P2d 1031 (1976); Thompson v. Scott, 270 Or 542, 528 P2d 509 (1974).
Affirmed. No costs to either party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
562 P.2d 169, 277 Or. 723, 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-matejka-or-1977.