Mason v. Mason

Connecticut Superior Court

Mason v. Mason

2 Kirby 18, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 18

DecidedNovember 15, 1786

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Kirby 18 (Mason v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mason v. Mason, 2 Kirby 18, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 18 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Pincite

Opinion

ACTION of account.—The defendant gave a general plea; he then took it back and agreed to the appointment of auditors. A question arose whether it would be regular to suffer a default and then move for auditors.

The Court were inclined that it would be regular, for there must be an interlocutory judgement before auditors can be appointed, which may well be on default.—

(Absentibus C.: Judge Law and Judge Sherman.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ACTION of account.—The defendant gave a general plea; he then took it back and agreed to the appointment of auditors. A question arose whether it would be regular to suffer a default and then move for auditors.

The Court were inclined that it would be regular, for there must be an interlocutory judgement before auditors can be appointed, which may well be on default.—

(Absentibus C.: Judge Law and Judge Sherman.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Kirby 18, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-mason-connsuperct-1786.