Mason v. Mason
This text of 16 F. Cas. 1048 (Mason v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court, (nem. con.) at the prayer of the plaintiff, instructed the jury that the defendant was liable for the whole amount paid by the plaintiff to take up the note.
Thruston, J., and Morsell, J., were of opinion that this ease differs from that of McDonald and Magruder at Washington, in this particular, that here the plaintiff was not originally one of the indorsers before the note was offered for discount.
Cranch, C. J., did not think that that circumstance was material, because he was of opinion that the prior indorser was liable to the subsequent, for the whole, unless there be an agreement to the contrary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F. Cas. 1048, 3 D.C. 648, 3 Cranch 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-mason-circtddc-1829.