Mason v. Johnson

51 Cal. 612
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1877·No. No. 4764·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

1. The protest served upon the defendant wras sufficient, for the defendant was bound to take notice of the matter, which rendered the tax illegal.

2. There was no authority in the tax collector of the city of Oakland to collect the taxes levied in the town of Brooklyn. He had not been elected tax collector by the qualified electors of Brooklyn, as required by the constitution. (Art. II, sec. 13.) The case of the People v. Hastings (29 Cal. 449) upon this point is decisive of this case.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to render judgment for the plaintiff upon the agreed statement of facts.

Mr. Justice McKinstry expressed no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 612 (Cal. 1877).

51 Cal. 612 (Mason v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spencer v. City of Los Angeles
179 P. 163 (California Supreme Court, 1919)
Whitford, Bartlett & Co. v. Clarke
80 A. 257 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1911)
Centennial Eureka Mining Co. v. Juab County
62 P. 1024 (Utah Supreme Court, 1900)
Rumford Chemical Works v. Ray
34 A. 814 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1896)
Smith v. Farrelly
52 Cal. 77 (California Supreme Court, 1877)