Mason v. Ham

36 Me. 573
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 Me. 573 (Mason v. Ham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mason v. Ham, 36 Me. 573 (Me. 1853).

Opinion

Rice, J. —

The defendant is sued as the representative of the estate of Alexander Townsend, on a bond executed by William Abbot, a former administrator on the same estate. Abbot, in 1835, obtained license from the Supreme Judicial Court to sell real estate of his intestate, for the payment of debts. The bond in suit was executed within' the year after the license was obtained.

Section 12, c. 52, stat. of 1821, provides that no license as aforesaid, for the sale of real estate, granted by either of the Courts aforesaid, shall be in force for a longer term than one year from the time when such license shall have been granted.”

The deed to the purchaser must be executed and delivered within the year, otherwise it is void. Marr v. Boothby, 19 Maine, 150.

No property will pass until the deed is given, and until then, in no legal sense, is there a sale. Macy v. Raymond, 9 Pick. 284.

In giving the bond in suit, if Abbot assumed to act in his capacity as administrator, he exceeded his authority, and did not thereby bind the estate ; if he acted in his private capacity, the estate is not bound. A nonsuit must be entered.

Shepley, C. J., and Tenney and Hathaway, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prouty v. Mather
49 Vt. 415 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Me. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-ham-me-1853.