Mason v. Ford

1918 OK 489, 174 P. 770, 71 Okla. 8, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 841

Opinion

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the suggestion of the de~ath of tile appellant and motion to dismiss appeal filed by her attorneys of record. The motion is accompanied by a showing to the effect that the appeal was tahen from an or-dei of the trial court appointing a guardian of the person and estate of the appellant; that after the said appeal was prosecuted to this court the appellant died, and thereafter her former guardian was appointed as her executor; that up to the time of the death of tile appellant her estate was in the ban~lS of P. M. Ford as guardian, and that it is now in the hands of P. M. Ford as ~xecutor.

In these circumstances the question pre~ seated for review has become moot and hypothetical, and the motion to dismiss must theref&re bej sustained.

All the Justices concur.