Mason v. Cutts
16 F. Cas. 1035, 5 D.C. 465, 5 Cranch 465
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 15, 1838
StatusPublished
This text of 16 F. Cas. 1035 (Mason v. Cutts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mason v. Cutts, 16 F. Cas. 1035, 5 D.C. 465, 5 Cranch 465 (circtddc 1838).
Opinion
The Court
absent,) decided, that the plaintiff’s intestate had not a specific lien on the ship; and if he had, he abandoned it when he received bills of exchange for the amount of his claim, and therefore he can only come in as a general creditor of Brown, and receive his dividend in the due course of administration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 1035, 5 D.C. 465, 5 Cranch 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-cutts-circtddc-1838.