Mason v. Crowder

Supreme Court of Missouri

Mason v. Crowder

98 Mo. 352

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedApril 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 Mo. 352 (Mason v. Crowder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mason v. Crowder, 98 Mo. 352 (Mo. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per cuRiAM.

— These cases were here before andaré ' reported as Mason v. Blade. 87 Mo. 831. The circuit court had dismissed the plaintiff’s petition, and that judgment we reversed, and we remanded the causes with directions. Subsequently we set aside the judgment of this court and then again reversed the judgment of the circuit court, and remanded the causes with directions different in some respects from those first given. The circuit court, on the return of the cases, proceeded to and did enter up a full decree without the production of any evidence. In this there was error. Our last judgment decreed the title to be in the plaintiff, even as against defendant, but as to any other and further relief, we remanded the causes to be tried anew, on such evidence as the parties might produce, according to the principles of law asserted in the opinion first filed. Of course the court cannot decree title out of persons who are not before it, but it can divest defendant of any apparent title he may have or cancel the deeds which are a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title. The trial court doubtless misunderstood the judgment last entered by this court. The judgment must therefore be again reversed and the causes remanded for further proceeding, and it is so ordered.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per cuRiAM.

— These cases were here before andaré ' reported as Mason v. Blade. 87 Mo. 831. The circuit court had dismissed the plaintiff’s petition, and that judgment we reversed, and we remanded the causes with directions. Subsequently we set aside the judgment of this court and then again reversed the judgment of the circuit court, and remanded the causes with directions different in some respects from those first given. The circuit court, on the return of the cases, proceeded to and did enter up a full decree without the production of any evidence. In this there was error. Our last judgment decreed the title to be in the plaintiff, even as against defendant, but as to any other and further relief, we remanded the causes to be tried anew, on such evidence as the parties might produce, according to the principles of law asserted in the opinion first filed. Of course the court cannot decree title out of persons who are not before it, but it can divest defendant of any apparent title he may have or cancel the deeds which are a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title. The trial court doubtless misunderstood the judgment last entered by this court. The judgment must therefore be again reversed and the causes remanded for further proceeding, and it is so ordered.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 Mo. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-crowder-mo-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack