Mason v. Cranor
This text of 219 F.2d 235 (Mason v. Cranor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
219 F.2d 235
In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
of Ben F. MASON, Appellant,
v.
John R. CRANOR, Superintendent of the Washington State
Penitentiary at Walls Walla, Washington, Appellee.
No. 14597.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 7, 1955.
Ben F. Mason, in pro. per.
Don Eastvold, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Movant alleges that he has appealed from an order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Southern Division.
He seeks bail pending appeal. Rule 27, subd. 1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides:
'Pending an appeal from the final decision of any court or judge declining to grant the writ of habeas corpus, the custody of the prisoner shall not be disturbed.' See also Rule 49, Rules of the Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C.A.
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 F.2d 235, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-cranor-ca9-1955.