Mason v. Cobb
96 S.E. 1042, 148 Ga. 469, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 377
Opinion
The allegations of the petition as amended, as against a general demurrer, presented such a case of mutual mistake in. expressing certain matters, and in omitting other matters, from a written contract that were intended to be expressed therein, as would authorize a decree of reformation in a court of equity. Civil Code, §§ 4570, 4576, 4579; Wyche v. Greene, 16 Ga. 49; Lucas v. Lucas, 30 Ga. 191 (76 Am. D. 642); Kelly v. Hamilton, 135 Ga. 505 (69 S. E. 724). The court erred in dismissing the petition.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mason v. Cobb, 96 S.E. 1042, 148 Ga. 469, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 377 (Ga. 1918).
96 S.E. 1042 (Mason v. Cobb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Head v. Stephens
109 S.E.2d 772 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Miller v. Shaw
92 S.E.2d 98 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Cheatham v. Palmer
13 S.E.2d 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Chapman v. Cassels Co.
179 S.E. 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
State Highway Department v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
147 S.E. 522 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Green v. Johnson
113 S.E. 402 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)