Mason v. City of New York

121 A.D.3d 468, 993 N.Y.S.2d 498
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 9, 2014·No. 13144 102068/10 590356/10 590741/10·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered September 9, 2013, which denied defendant/third-party defendant-appellant Enviro & Demo Masters, Inc.’s (Enviro) motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross claims asserted against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Enviro’s motion for summary judgment is premature, given that the issues raised require further discovery, which has not yet been completed (see Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 506 [1993]; Blech v West Park Presbyt. Church, 97 AD3d 443, 443 [1st Dept 2012]). In any event, the submissions raise triable issues of fact, precluding summary judgment.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. City of New York, 121 A.D.3d 468, 993 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 468 (Mason v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Xenia Liu v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 33076(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Anaya v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 24223 (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Dawkins v. Bailey House, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 32841(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Frazier v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 32543(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Baez v. NYC Hous. Dev. Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 30548(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)