Mason v. Bidleman

1 How. Pr. 61
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 61 (Mason v. Bidleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mason v. Bidleman, 1 How. Pr. 61 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The inquest was regular, and although the affidavit of merits produced on the motion is sufficient, yet the defendant having made a case, must rely upon it; he can not take the double chance of beating his adversary.

Decision.—Motion denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-bidleman-nysupct-1844.