Mason v. B. & J. Slevin

1 White & W. 13
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 12, 1877·No. No. 401, Op. Book, No. 1, p. 169·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 11. Judgment by default. It is a rule of practice settled by an unbroken line of decisions in this state, that in a judgment by default the facts set out in the petition [14]*14are to be taken as proved. [Watson v. Newsham, 17 Tex. 437; Guest v. Rhine, 16 Tex. 550; Willard v. Conduit, 10 Tex. 214; Swift v. Faris, 11 Tex. 19; Long v. Wortham, 4 Tex. 381; Hall v. Jackson, 3 Tex. 305; Ricks v. Pinson, 21 Tex. 508; Trabue v. Stonum, 20 Tex. 454; Niblett v. Shelton, 28 Tex. 551.]

April 12, 1877.

§ 12. After judgment by default. It is too late to object that petition does not set out the will and its probate substantially or in hoec verba.

§ IB. Partnership; continuation of after death of a partner. A partnership can be extended by will so as to continue after the death of the testator. [1 Pars, on Cont. 5th ed. p. 208, note d. ]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. B. & J. Slevin, 1 White & W. 13 (Tex. Ct. App. 1877).

1 White & W. 13 (Mason v. B. & J. Slevin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Jackson
3 Tex. 305 (Texas Supreme Court, 1848)
Watson v. Newsham
17 Tex. 437 (Texas Supreme Court, 1856)
Niblett v. Shelton
28 Tex. 548 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)