Mason Tire & Rubber Co. v. Lansinger
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mason Tire & Rubber Co. v. Lansinger. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 864 →
Opinion
1. Under Section 11463, General Code, the interrogatories are limited to the “particular questions of tact.”
2. An interrogatory sough to be submitted under Íiat section, requesting the jury to find as to “reason-ble warning,” reasonable signals, or reasonable care and the like, calls for conclusions of fact, or conclusions of mixed fact and law, and is not authorized by that statute. (Brier Hill Steel Co. v. Ianakis, 93 Ohio St., 300, 303, approved and followed.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mason Tire & Rubber Co. v. Lansinger, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499 (Ohio 1923).
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499 (Mason Tire & Rubber Co. v. Lansinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.