Maslonka v. Hermann

428 A.2d 504, 85 N.J. 533, 1981 N.J. LEXIS 1604
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 9, 1981·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is reversed and the matter remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for trial, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Milmed in the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J.Super. 566, 581 (1980).

POLLOCK, J., dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J.Super. 566 (1980).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 5.

For affirmance — Justice POLLOCK — 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maslonka v. Hermann, 428 A.2d 504, 85 N.J. 533, 1981 N.J. LEXIS 1604 (N.J. 1981).

428 A.2d 504 (Maslonka v. Hermann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Estate of Chin v. ST. BARNABAS MED. CENTER
711 A.2d 352 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)