Maslonka v. Hermann
This text of 428 A.2d 504 (Maslonka v. Hermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment below is reversed and the matter remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for trial, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Milmed in the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J.Super. 566, 581 (1980).
I would affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J.Super. 566 (1980).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 5.
For affirmance — Justice POLLOCK — 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
428 A.2d 504, 85 N.J. 533, 1981 N.J. LEXIS 1604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maslonka-v-hermann-nj-1981.