Maskins v. Roe
This text of 21 F. App'x 780 (Maskins v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We reverse the dismissal of petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus and remand the petition to the district court in light of Whalem/Hunt v. Early, 233 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). We remand for the purpose of the factual development of petitioner’s claims regarding equitable tolling and statutory tolling under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F. App'x 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maskins-v-roe-ca9-2001.