Maskell v. Beaulieu

Supreme Court of Vermont

Maskell v. Beaulieu

435 A.2d 699, 140 Vt. 75, 1981 Vt. LEXIS 570

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedSeptember 1, 1981

Docket372-80

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 435 A.2d 699 (Maskell v. Beaulieu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maskell v. Beaulieu, 435 A.2d 699, 140 Vt. 75, 1981 Vt. LEXIS 570 (Vt. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs brought an action for specific performance and damages. Defendant answered and counterclaimed for damages. The action was heard by a court consisting of a presiding judge and two assistant judges.

The court ordered defendant to convey the real property at issue to the Machias and pay damages to the Machias and Maskell. It was further ordered that Maskell pay defendant one dollar on his counterclaim. From this order, defendant appeals. We reverse.

In Pockette v. LaDuke, 139 Vt. 625, 432 A.2d 1191 (1981), we held that a suit in equity should be heard alone and exclusively by the presiding superior judge. Assistant judges have no role in these matters, and their presence is improper. The record in this case reveals that the assistant judges not only sat at the hearing but participated in making the findings of fact and conclusions of law.

As this case sounds in equity and as the assistant judges participated in the hearing, we hold that this court was improperly constituted. Since this circumstance clearly affected the eventual result, we remand for retrial on all matters still at issue.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI