Mashore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Mashore v. State

1925 OK CR 264, 235 P. 1118, 30 Okla. Crim. 360, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 16, 1925

DocketNo. A-5147.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 264 (Mashore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mashore v. State, 1925 OK CR 264, 235 P. 1118, 30 Okla. Crim. 360, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Ord Mashore, was convicted on a charge of maintaining a place in the city of Anadarko, where intoxicating liquors were kept and possessed for sale, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in jail and to pay a fine of $200. To reverse the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on May 2, 1924, petition in error with case-made. When the case was called for final submission, his counsel of record, in open court, announced the death of the plaintiff in error and moved to abate the proceedings. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the proceedings in the above entitled cause, especially under the judgment therein rendered, has abated, and that the county court of Caddo county enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Ord Mashore, was convicted on a charge of maintaining a place in the city of Anadarko, where intoxicating liquors were kept and possessed for sale, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in jail and to pay a fine of $200. To reverse the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on May 2, 1924, petition in error with case-made. When the case was called for final submission, his counsel of record, in open court, announced the death of the plaintiff in error and moved to abate the proceedings. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the proceedings in the above entitled cause, especially under the judgment therein rendered, has abated, and that the county court of Caddo county enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 264, 235 P. 1118, 30 Okla. Crim. 360, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mashore-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.