Mashkowitz v. O'Connell

91 N.Y.S. 115
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 91 N.Y.S. 115 (Mashkowitz v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mashkowitz v. O'Connell, 91 N.Y.S. 115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

BISCHOFF, J.

The judgment for dismissal of the complaint upon the merits (Municipal Court Act, § 249; Daws 1902, p. 1561, c. 580) is supported by credible evidence that the plaintiff was not employed as a broker, but was dealt with as one who asserted himself to be an intending purchaser. Thus we cannot assume that the conclusion was reached upon some other ground, assailed by the appellant as erroneous. It would appear, however, that the absence of written authority was fatal to the case. Whiteley v. Terry, 83 App. Div. 197, 82 N. Y. Supp. 89.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whiteley v. Terry
83 A.D. 197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 N.Y.S. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mashkowitz-v-oconnell-nyappterm-1904.