Mashburn v. Master Mobilelink LLC
This text of Mashburn v. Master Mobilelink LLC (Mashburn v. Master Mobilelink LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
SHANNON MASHBURN PLAINTIFF
No. 4:21-cv-412-DPM
MASTER MOBILELINK, LLC DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. The joint motion, Doc. 20, is granted. The proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC, 927 F.3d 1024, 2027 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods, 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of the parties’ wage-related dispute. The Court applauds the bullet-point listing of the legal sources of all the released claims. Doc. 21 at 3. This way of listing promotes clarity. And the attorney’s fee, though allocated in the settlement agreement, was negotiated separately. The Court will dismiss the complaint with prejudice and retain jurisdiction for a time to enforce the settlement. 2. The embedded motion to withdraw the motion to enforce settlement, Doc. 18, is granted. Doc. 18 is withdrawn without prejudice.
So Ordered.
SPrarvstoll □□□ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -_ 4 Pay 20S
ihe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mashburn v. Master Mobilelink LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mashburn-v-master-mobilelink-llc-ared-2023.