Mashburn v. Inman

24 S.E. 39, 97 Ga. 396
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 21, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 39 (Mashburn v. Inman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mashburn v. Inman, 24 S.E. 39, 97 Ga. 396 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. This case falls within tlie general rule that to an action sounding in contract, the defendant cannot plead as a set-off a claim arising ew delicto.

2. The question as to attorney’s fees is controlled hy the decision of this court in Butler v. Mutual &c. Company, 94 Ga. 563.

Judgment affirmed.

Arnold & Arnold, for plaintiff in error. Brandon & Arkwright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Lumber Co. v. Johnson-Battle Lumber Co.
120 S.E. 640 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Daniel v. Nixon
99 S.E. 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Glisson v. Weil & Co.
45 S.E. 221 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.
41 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 39, 97 Ga. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mashburn-v-inman-ga-1895.