Mashburn v. Inman

24 S.E. 39, 97 Ga. 396
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 21, 1895·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. This case falls within tlie general rule that to an action sounding in contract, the defendant cannot plead as a set-off a claim arising ew delicto.

2. The question as to attorney’s fees is controlled hy the decision of this court in Butler v. Mutual &c. Company, 94 Ga. 563.

Judgment affirmed.

Arnold & Arnold, for plaintiff in error. Brandon & Arkwright, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mashburn v. Inman, 24 S.E. 39, 97 Ga. 396 (Ga. 1895).

24 S.E. 39 (Mashburn v. Inman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Lumber Co. v. Johnson-Battle Lumber Co.
120 S.E. 640 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Daniel v. Nixon
99 S.E. 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Glisson v. Weil & Co.
45 S.E. 221 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.
41 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)