Mash v. Daniel & Co.
105 Ala. 393
This text of 105 Ala. 393 (Mash v. Daniel & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mash v. Daniel & Co., 105 Ala. 393 (Ala. 1894).
Opinion
The case of Johnson & Co. v. Davis, 95 Ala. 293,- settles, in principle, that when the maker of a paper and another both hold the pen and make the mark, near to the maker’s name, with intention on the part of the maker to execute the instrument, the making of the mark is the act of the maker, and not the other party who holds the pen with him.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hamilton v. Adams
108 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Mosaic Templars of America v. Mills
102 So. 538 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Nance
101 So. 825 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Barksdale v. Bullington
69 So. 891 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Houston v. State
114 Ala. 15 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 Ala. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mash-v-daniel-co-ala-1894.