Mash v. Daniel & Co.
105 Ala. 393
Opinion
The case of Johnson & Co. v. Davis, 95 Ala. 293,- settles, in principle, that when the maker of a paper and another both hold the pen and make the mark, near to the maker’s name, with intention on the part of the maker to execute the instrument, the making of the mark is the act of the maker, and not the other party who holds the pen with him.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mash v. Daniel & Co., 105 Ala. 393 (Ala. 1894).
105 Ala. 393 (Mash v. Daniel & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamilton v. Adams
108 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Mosaic Templars of America v. Mills
102 So. 538 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Nance
101 So. 825 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Barksdale v. Bullington
69 So. 891 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Houston v. State
114 Ala. 15 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)