Mascraft v. Van Antwerp
3 Cow. 334
Opinion
As the Sheriff advertised on one execution only, he can state no other in the certificate or deed of sale; but the whole sum bid by Mascraft should be inserted, that the debtor or a creditor, coming to redeem, may know the amount of principal and interest he is to pay, and the purchaser, on the other hand, be secure of receiving the amount which he has paid.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mascraft v. Van Antwerp, 3 Cow. 334 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
3 Cow. 334 (Mascraft v. Van Antwerp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Camp v. . Searle
41 N.E. 427 (New York Court of Appeals, 1895)
Husted v. Dakin
17 Abb. Pr. 137 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Bliss v. Watkins
16 Ala. 229 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)