Masco Corp. v. Suarez

Washington Supreme Court

Masco Corp. v. Suarez

441 P.3d 1194, 193 Wash. 2d 1015

Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 2019·No. No. 96879-9·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondent's motion to strike Petitioner's reply is granted.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondent's motion to strike Petitioner's reply is granted.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Masco Corp. v. Suarez, 441 P.3d 1194, 193 Wash. 2d 1015 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

441 P.3d 1194 (Masco Corp. v. Suarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.