Mascia v. Cho Ho Leung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mascia v. Cho Ho Leung

282 A.D.2d 580, 722 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3807

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 15, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of the defendants’ [581]*581motion for summary judgment. Under the circumstances of this case, we need not decide at this time whether the Nose-worthy doctrine applies (see, Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 15, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of the defendants’ [581]*581motion for summary judgment. Under the circumstances of this case, we need not decide at this time whether the Nose-worthy doctrine applies (see, Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Mascia v. Cho Ho Leung, 282 A.D.2d 580, 722 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

282 A.D.2d 580 (Mascia v. Cho Ho Leung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related