Mascaro v. State
This text of 346 N.E.2d 543 (Mascaro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. There was insufficient proof in this case on which to posit a finding that there was a duty on the part of the State to maintain the curb in issue here. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division. Our disposition makes it unnecessary to decide between the Court of Claims’ and the Appellate Division’s findings of fact on the issues of negligence and notice.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
346 N.E.2d 543, 38 N.Y.2d 870, 382 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mascaro-v-state-ny-1976.