Mascaro v. State
346 N.E.2d 543, 38 N.Y.2d 870, 382 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2318
Opinion
Memorandum. There was insufficient proof in this case on which to posit a finding that there was a duty on the part of the State to maintain the curb in issue here. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division. Our disposition makes it unnecessary to decide between the Court of Claims’ and the Appellate Division’s findings of fact on the issues of negligence and notice.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mascaro v. State, 346 N.E.2d 543, 38 N.Y.2d 870, 382 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2318 (N.Y. 1976).
346 N.E.2d 543 (Mascaro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Christian v. United States
859 F. Supp. 2d 468 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Castle v. Six Flags, Inc.
81 A.D.3d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Tesak v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.
254 A.D.2d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Marinaccio v. LeChambord Restaurant
246 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Trincere v. County of Suffolk
232 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Morales v. Riverbay Corp.
226 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Nado v. State
161 Misc. 2d 178 (New York State Court of Claims, 1993)
Guerrieri v. Summa
193 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Evans v. Pyramid Co.
184 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Van Etten v. State
103 Misc. 2d 487 (New York State Court of Claims, 1980)
Tripoli v. State
72 A.D.2d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)