Mascarel v. State
This text of 198 So. 2d 649 (Mascarel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 motion, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm the trial court on the authority of Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966), wherein the United States Supreme Court held that Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), and Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), should not be given retroactive effect.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 So. 2d 649, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mascarel-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.