Mascarel v. State
198 So. 2d 649, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4786
Opinion
Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 motion, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm the trial court on the authority of Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966), wherein the United States Supreme Court held that Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), and Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), should not be given retroactive effect.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mascarel v. State, 198 So. 2d 649, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4786 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
198 So. 2d 649 (Mascarel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. State
210 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)