Mascam Restaurant Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mascam Restaurant Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority

192 A.D.2d 319, 595 N.Y.S.2d 453

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 319 (Mascam Restaurant Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mascam Restaurant Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 192 A.D.2d 319, 595 N.Y.S.2d 453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered May 22, 1992, which, [320]*320upon respondent’s failure to appear on the calendar call, granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s application to alter its premises, and directed respondent to approve such alteration application, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

No appeal lies from a default judgment, the proper remedy being a motion to vacate the default (7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 5511.10). Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered May 22, 1992, which, [320]*320upon respondent’s failure to appear on the calendar call, granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s application to alter its premises, and directed respondent to approve such alteration application, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

No appeal lies from a default judgment, the proper remedy being a motion to vacate the default (7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 5511.10). Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 319, 595 N.Y.S.2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mascam-restaurant-corp-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1993.