Masada v. Hammond
This text of Masada v. Hammond (Masada v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7192
EL SHADDAI MASADA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFF HAMMOND, Clerk of Court, Lancaster County; ROBERT E. PETERSEN, Deputy General Counsel, SCDC; LEE S. ALFORD, Circuit Court Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-01-2536-8)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
El Shaddai Masada, Appellant Pro Se. David Leon Morrison, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
El Shaddai Masada appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his complaint construed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Masada v.
Hammond, No. CA-01-2536-8 (D.S.C. July 22, 2002). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Masada v. Hammond, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masada-v-hammond-ca4-2002.