Mas v. Metropolitan Dade County

775 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 467, 2001 WL 55373
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 2001·No. No. 3D00-615·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment in the County’s favor on plaintiffs’ false arrest/false imprisonment claims. “The record clearly shows, without material dispute, that the police officers had probable cause to arrest [plaintiffs].” Medard v. Miami-Dade County, 769 So.2d 1127,1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bolanos v. Metropolitan Dade County, 677 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). “Since probable cause is a complete bar to an action for false arrest and false imprisonment, summary judgment was properly entered in the County’s favor.” Bolanos, 677 So.2d at 1005 (citations omitted).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mas v. Metropolitan Dade County, 775 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 467, 2001 WL 55373 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

775 So. 2d 1010 (Mas v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fils v. City of Aventura
768 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Florida, 2010)
Whittington v. Town of Surfside
490 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Florida, 2007)