Mas v. Metropolitan Dade County

775 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 467, 2001 WL 55373
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-615
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 775 So. 2d 1010 (Mas v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mas v. Metropolitan Dade County, 775 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 467, 2001 WL 55373 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment in the County’s favor on plaintiffs’ false arrest/false imprisonment claims. “The record clearly shows, without material dispute, that the police officers had probable cause to arrest [plaintiffs].” Medard v. Miami-Dade County, 769 So.2d 1127,1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bolanos v. Metropolitan Dade County, 677 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). “Since probable cause is a complete bar to an action for false arrest and false imprisonment, summary judgment was properly entered in the County’s favor.” Bolanos, 677 So.2d at 1005 (citations omitted).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fils v. City of Aventura
768 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Florida, 2010)
Whittington v. Town of Surfside
490 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 So. 2d 1010, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 467, 2001 WL 55373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mas-v-metropolitan-dade-county-fladistctapp-2001.