Marzullo v. General Motors Corp.

34 A.D.3d 540, 825 N.Y.S.2d 492
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 34 A.D.3d 540 (Marzullo v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marzullo v. General Motors Corp., 34 A.D.3d 540, 825 N.Y.S.2d 492 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages pursuant to General Business Law § 198-a, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated December 2, 2005, which granted the motion of the defendant General Motors Corporation to deem her application for an award of a statutory attorney’s fee abandoned pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48 on the ground that she had failed to settle an order and judgment within 60 days, and denied her cross motion for an extension of time to settle an order and judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the motion is denied, and the cross motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the respondent’s motion to deem the plaintiffs application for an award of a statutory attorney’s fee abandoned pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48 on the ground that the plaintiff failed to settle an order and judgment within 60 days. The plaintiff set forth a valid excuse for the short delay, the plaintiff’s actions were devoid of any intent to abandon her claim, and the record evinces a lack of prejudice to the respondent (see CPLR 2005; Lawton v Lawton, 239 AD2d 866 [1997]; Parisi v McElhatton, 209 AD2d 495 [1994]; Levine v Levine, 179 AD2d 625 [1992]). Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lola Roberts Beauty Salon, Inc. v. Able Motor Cars Corp.
213 A.D.3d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Town of Southold v. Estate of Edson
78 A.D.3d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Granite Associates, Inc. v. Rolon
69 A.D.3d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Estate of Imperato
67 A.D.3d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Neri's Land Improvement, LLC v. J.J. Cassone Bakery, Inc.
65 A.D.3d 1312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Marzullo v. General Motors Corp.
54 A.D.3d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.3d 540, 825 N.Y.S.2d 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marzullo-v-general-motors-corp-nyappdiv-2006.