Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co.
80 A.2d 554, 7 N.J. 116, 1951 N.J. LEXIS 202
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge McGeehan speaking for the majority in the Appellate Division of the Superior Court, 11 N. J. Super. 46, except that the defendant, Nathan Peekerman, is relieved of the payment of the plaintiffs costs on his appeal as provided in said opinion.
For affirmance and modification—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co., 80 A.2d 554, 7 N.J. 116, 1951 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1951).
80 A.2d 554 (Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vasquez v. Mansol Realty
655 A.2d 82 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Milacci v. Mato Realty Co., Inc.
525 A.2d 1120 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Gould v. Winokur
237 A.2d 916 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Advance Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co.
166 A.2d 173 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Greenberg v. Stanley
153 A.2d 833 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Flynn v. Stearns
145 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
BORNSTEIN EX REL. BORNSTEIN v. Metropolitan Bottling Co.
132 A.2d 825 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Guzzi v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.
115 A.2d 629 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Hartpence v. Grouleff
100 A.2d 298 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Bevilacqua v. Sutter
98 A.2d 60 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
King v. Patrylow
83 A.2d 639 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Francisco v. Miller
81 A.2d 803 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)