Marziale v. Correct Care Solutions LLC
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CHRISTINA MARZIALE, Individually and as mother of Baby Boy Marziale; and DANA MCLAIN, Administrator of the Estate of Elaine Marziale PLAINTIFFS
v. No. 5:18-cv-86-DPM
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC; MAKITA LAGRANT; STEPHEN COOK; and WELLPATH LLC DEFENDANTS
ORDER The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere’s unopposed recommendation, Doc. 338. FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Marziale and McLain are entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses stemming from their second motion for sanctions. Doc. 263 & 332. They seek $46,475; Judge Deere recommends $15,565.50. The fee as reduced represents a fair and reasonable amount for the work. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 435 (1983); Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc., 304 Ark. 227, 229, 800 S.W.2d 717, 718-19 (1990). Plaintiffs’ petition for attorney’s fees, Doc. 334, granted as modified.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge AT May Zon!
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marziale v. Correct Care Solutions LLC (Marziale v. Correct Care Solutions LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.