Marzettie v. State

608 So. 2d 419, 1992 WL 298131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marzettie v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 400
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 23, 1992·No. CR-91-858·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Ronald Joseph Marzettie, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant pleaded guilty to unlawful distribution of a controlled substance and was placed on probation. His probation was revoked in 1990. The appellant alleged in his petition that his counsel rendered ineffective [420]*420assistance by failing to request a hearing on his probation revocation. We remanded this case so that the trial court could determine the merits of the appellant’s claim. 608 So.2d 419. On remand, however, the trial court has set aside the order revoking the appellant’s probation and has appointed new counsel to represent him in a subsequent probation revocation proceeding. The appellant’s appeal is rendered moot by the action of the trial court. This appeal is therefore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marzettie v. State, 608 So. 2d 419, 1992 WL 298131 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 419 (Marzettie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marzettie v. State
608 So. 2d 419 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)