Marysabel Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 6, 2014·No. 01-14-00088-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 6, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00088-CV ——————————— MARYSABEL VASQUEZ, Appellant V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 976692

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Marysabel Vasquez, has neither paid the required fees nor

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013);

Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).

Further, Vasquez has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing

the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal

was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5; 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marysabel Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Marysabel Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Marysabel Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.