Maryland Trust Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Maryland Trust Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co.

149 F. 443, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1906

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 F. 443 (Maryland Trust Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maryland Trust Co. v. Kirby Lumber Co., 149 F. 443, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026 (circtsdny 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit judge.

The Kirby Lumber Company may examine such witnesses as it desires to call in Texas upon a commission which shall set forth the names of the witnesses to be examined, so that counsel for the claimant may be able intelligently to determine whether or not it is desirable that he should attend their examination. The commission may be an open one, not on written interrogatories, if counsel for defendant so elect.. But, in the event of such election, claimant’s counsel may give notice that they elect not to incur the expense of attendance in a remote jurisdiction, and if they do so they may interpose their objections to testimony, and may prepare their cross-interrogatories after the direct testimony shall have been returned; or they may, at that time, elect orally to cross-examine the Texas witnesses, in which event such witnesses shall be produced for such cross-examination on reasonable notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit judge.

The Kirby Lumber Company may examine such witnesses as it desires to call in Texas upon a commission which shall set forth the names of the witnesses to be examined, so that counsel for the claimant may be able intelligently to determine whether or not it is desirable that he should attend their examination. The commission may be an open one, not on written interrogatories, if counsel for defendant so elect.. But, in the event of such election, claimant’s counsel may give notice that they elect not to incur the expense of attendance in a remote jurisdiction, and if they do so they may interpose their objections to testimony, and may prepare their cross-interrogatories after the direct testimony shall have been returned; or they may, at that time, elect orally to cross-examine the Texas witnesses, in which event such witnesses shall be produced for such cross-examination on reasonable notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 F. 443, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-trust-co-v-kirby-lumber-co-circtsdny-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack