Maryland National Insurance Co. v. State ex rel. Dade County

243 So. 2d 183, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5367
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 1971
DocketNos. 70-404, 70-406, 70-407
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 243 So. 2d 183 (Maryland National Insurance Co. v. State ex rel. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maryland National Insurance Co. v. State ex rel. Dade County, 243 So. 2d 183, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5367 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Maryland National Insurance Company appeals from final judgments in the Circuit Court of Dade County on three separate orders of forfeiture from the Criminal Court of Record, in and for Dade County, Florida. These appeals have been consolidated by order of this court.

Appellant argues that the final judgments were improperly entered by the trial court judge and that § 903.27, Fla.Stat., F. S.A., requires such judgments to be entered by the Clerk and that proper statutory procedure was not followed. It argues that the final judgments were also erroneous because they included costs and interests and these items are not specifically authorized under the terms of the statute.

While these points were vigorously argued here we cannot consider them as they are raised for the first time on appeal and were never presented to the trial judge for a ruling.

Section 903.271, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., permits appellant the right to have presented these arguments and points to the Circuit Court and permits that court to set aside the final judgment in whole or in part for reasonable cause shown within a time certain.

Appellant, by failing to utilize the statutory procedures, which would have permitted the trial court to make a determination of the points raised in this appeal, has not allowed the trial court judge to rule on these items and we may not consider them for the first time in this appeal. Margolis v. Klein, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 205; Beaty v. Beaty, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 54; and Wasserburg v. Coastal Aluminum Products Const. Co., Fla.App. 1964, 167 So. 2d 889.

The final judgments herein appealed are, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Velasco
855 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Winfield v. Second National Bank of North Miami
381 So. 2d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 So. 2d 183, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-national-insurance-co-v-state-ex-rel-dade-county-fladistctapp-1971.