Home/Supreme Court/Maryland Jockey Club v. Spencer

Maryland Jockey Club v. Spencer

307 U.S. 612, 59 S. Ct. 1034
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 22, 1939
DocketNo. 907
StatusPublished

This text of 307 U.S. 612 (Maryland Jockey Club v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maryland Jockey Club v. Spencer, 307 U.S. 612, 59 S. Ct. 1034 (1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1). Carmichael v. Southern Coal Co., 301 U. S. 495; 521-523; Thomas v. Gay, 169 U. S. 264, 278-280; Cincinnati [613]*613Soap Co. v. United States, 301 U. S. 308, 313; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, 303 U. S. 573, 584-587; (2) Fort Smith Light Co. v. Paving District, 274 U. S. 387, 391; Missouri Ry. Co. v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205, 209; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, supra, at pp. 578-579.

Messrs. Stuart S. Janney and Frank B. Ober for appellant. Messrs. William C. Walsh, Wm. L. Henderson, and Randolph Barton, Jr. for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKey
127 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Thomas v. Gay
169 U.S. 264 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United States
301 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.
301 U.S. 495 (Supreme Court, 1937)
New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New York
303 U.S. 573 (Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 U.S. 612, 59 S. Ct. 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-jockey-club-v-spencer-scotus-1939.