Maryland Jockey Club v. Spencer

307 U.S. 612, 59 S. Ct. 1034
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 22, 1939·No. No. 907·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1). Carmichael v. Southern Coal Co., 301 U. S. 495; 521-523; Thomas v. Gay, 169 U. S. 264, 278-280; Cincinnati [613]*613Soap Co. v. United States, 301 U. S. 308, 313; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, 303 U. S. 573, 584-587; (2) Fort Smith Light Co. v. Paving District, 274 U. S. 387, 391; Missouri Ry. Co. v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205, 209; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, supra, at pp. 578-579.

Messrs. Stuart S. Janney and Frank B. Ober for appellant. Messrs. William C. Walsh, Wm. L. Henderson, and Randolph Barton, Jr. for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maryland Jockey Club v. Spencer, 307 U.S. 612, 59 S. Ct. 1034 (1939).

307 U.S. 612 (Maryland Jockey Club v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKey
127 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Thomas v. Gay
169 U.S. 264 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United States
301 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.
301 U.S. 495 (Supreme Court, 1937)
New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New York
303 U.S. 573 (Supreme Court, 1938)