Maryland Casualty Insurance v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maryland Casualty Insurance v. Lopez

287 A.D.2d 719, 732 N.Y.S.2d 57, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 287 A.D.2d 719 (Maryland Casualty Insurance v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maryland Casualty Insurance v. Lopez, 287 A.D.2d 719, 732 N.Y.S.2d 57, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, or, in the alternative, to temporarily stay arbitration pending a hearing to determine whether State Farm Insurance Company insured the offending vehicle at the time of the accident and to add it as a respondent, State Farm Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated November 1, 2000, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the petition which was to permanently stay arbitration and substituting a provision therefor denying that branch of the petition; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, State Farm Insurance Company and its insured, Christopher Cruz, are joined as respondents, and arbitration is stayed pending an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the alleged offending vehicle was insured by State Farm Insurance Company on the date of the accident.

The petitioner met its initial burden of proving that the alleged offending vehicle was insured by State Farm Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) at the time of the accident (see, Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Youngblood, 270 AD2d 493; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Bohl, 262 AD2d 645; Matter of Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v Beliard, 256 AD2d 579). Thus, the burden shifted to State Farm to prove that it did not insure the offending vehicle at the time of the accident (see, Matter of American Home Assur. Co. v Wai Ip Wong, 249 AD2d 301; Matter of Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co. v Quichiz, 238 AD2d 421). Here, Nextah Lopez, a driver of one of the cars involved in the accident, and State Farm came forward with sufficient evidence to raise an issue of fact. Under the circumstances, a hearing is required to determine whether the offending vehicle was insured by State Farm on the date of the accident. Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings, [720]*720including the joining of State Farm and its insured, Christopher Cruz, as respondents (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Frederick, 266 AD2d 283). Santucci, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, or, in the alternative, to temporarily stay arbitration pending a hearing to determine whether State Farm Insurance Company insured the offending vehicle at the time of the accident and to add it as a respondent, State Farm Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated November 1, 2000, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the petition which was to permanently stay arbitration and substituting a provision therefor denying that branch of the petition; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, State Farm Insurance Company and its insured, Christopher Cruz, are joined as respondents, and arbitration is stayed pending an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the alleged offending vehicle was insured by State Farm Insurance Company on the date of the accident.

The petitioner met its initial burden of proving that the alleged offending vehicle was insured by State Farm Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) at the time of the accident (see, Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Youngblood, 270 AD2d 493; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v Bohl, 262 AD2d 645; Matter of Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v Beliard, 256 AD2d 579). Thus, the burden shifted to State Farm to prove that it did not insure the offending vehicle at the time of the accident (see, Matter of American Home Assur. Co. v Wai Ip Wong, 249 AD2d 301; Matter of Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co. v Quichiz, 238 AD2d 421). Here, Nextah Lopez, a driver of one of the cars involved in the accident, and State Farm came forward with sufficient evidence to raise an issue of fact. Under the circumstances, a hearing is required to determine whether the offending vehicle was insured by State Farm on the date of the accident. Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings, [720]*720including the joining of State Farm and its insured, Christopher Cruz, as respondents (see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Frederick, 266 AD2d 283). Santucci, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.D.2d 719, 732 N.Y.S.2d 57, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-insurance-v-lopez-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack