Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Maryland Casualty Co. v. Turk

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Turk

136 S.E. 87, 36 Ga. App. 199, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 864
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1926
Docket17662
StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 87 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Turk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Turk, 136 S.E. 87, 36 Ga. App. 199, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 864 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This court can not say in this ease that there is no evidence to support the finding of the industrial commission upon the issues presented; and the judgment of the superior court, approving the award, must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E. 87, 36 Ga. App. 199, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-turk-gactapp-1926.