Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders

187 S.E. 391, 53 Ga. App. 696, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 371

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 10, 1936

Docket23619

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 S.E. 391 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders, 187 S.E. 391, 53 Ga. App. 696, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 371 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

Under the ruling- of the Supreme Court on a review of this case on certiorari, the judgment of the Department of Industrial Relations denying compensation was authorized by the evidence, and the Court of Appeals erred in holding that this judgment was not authorized by the evidence, but that under the uncontradicted evidence an award of compensation was demanded, and erred in affirming the judgment of the superior court sustaining the appeal from the judgment of the Department of Industrial Relations. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders, 182 Ga. 594 (186 S. E. 693). Therefore, in conformity to the judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court, the judgment of this court in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders, 49 App. 600 (176 S. E. 104), affirming the judgment of the superior court, must be vacated, and a judgment reversing the judgment of the superior court must be rendered.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

Under the ruling- of the Supreme Court on a review of this case on certiorari, the judgment of the Department of Industrial Relations denying compensation was authorized by the evidence, and the Court of Appeals erred in holding that this judgment was not authorized by the evidence, but that under the uncontradicted evidence an award of compensation was demanded, and erred in affirming the judgment of the superior court sustaining the appeal from the judgment of the Department of Industrial Relations. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders, 182 Ga. 594 (186 S. E. 693). Therefore, in conformity to the judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court, the judgment of this court in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sanders, 49 App. 600 (176 S. E. 104), affirming the judgment of the superior court, must be vacated, and a judgment reversing the judgment of the superior court must be rendered.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 S.E. 391, 53 Ga. App. 696, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-sanders-gactapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack