Maryland Casualty Co. v. M. A. Talbott Co.

Baltimore City Superior Court

Maryland Casualty Co. v. M. A. Talbott Co.

2 Balt. C. Rep. 595

DecidedDecember 5, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Balt. C. Rep. 595 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. M. A. Talbott Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maryland Casualty Co. v. M. A. Talbott Co., 2 Balt. C. Rep. 595 (Md. Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

IflLIJOTT, J.—

1. Defendant must be summoned before the Return Day.

2. October 12, 15)08, was declared by the Governor to be a legal holiday, the same day was the October Return Day. The court held, that in computing the fifteen days within which the defendant must plead, the holiday would not be excluded.

In this case the account was not sufficient to support a suit under the Act in that it was not exact, i. e., liquidated, so that the court, without further evidence, could extend a judgment, and Die motion for a judgment by default is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IflLIJOTT, J.—

1. Defendant must be summoned before the Return Day.

2. October 12, 15)08, was declared by the Governor to be a legal holiday, the same day was the October Return Day. The court held, that in computing the fifteen days within which the defendant must plead, the holiday would not be excluded.

In this case the account was not sufficient to support a suit under the Act in that it was not exact, i. e., liquidated, so that the court, without further evidence, could extend a judgment, and Die motion for a judgment by default is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Balt. C. Rep. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-m-a-talbott-co-mdsuperctbalt-1908.