Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones
188 So. 690, 237 Ala. 655, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 299
Opinion
This case was submitted along with the case of Maryland Casualty Company v. Dink Matthews, ante, p. 650, 188 So. 688, involving the same pleadings and facts, mutato nomine.
Upon the authority of the case of Maryland Casualty Company v. Dink Matthews, supra, this day decided, and now in manuscript, the decree of the circuit court is reversed, and a decree here entered denying relief to complainant, and dismissing the bill.
Reversed and rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones, 188 So. 690, 237 Ala. 655, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 299 (Ala. 1939).
188 So. 690 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Matthews
188 So. 688 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)