Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones

188 So. 690, 237 Ala. 655, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 299
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 4, 1939
Docket4 Div. 84.
StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 690 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones, 188 So. 690, 237 Ala. 655, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 299 (Ala. 1939).

Opinion

KNIGHT, Justice.

This case was submitted along with the case of Maryland Casualty Company v. Dink Matthews, ante, p. 650, 188 So. 688, involving the same pleadings and facts, mutato nomine.

Upon the authority of the case of Maryland Casualty Company v. Dink Matthews, supra, this day decided, and now in manuscript, the decree of the circuit court is reversed, and a decree here entered denying relief to complainant, and dismissing the bill.

Reversed and rendered.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Matthews
188 So. 688 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 690, 237 Ala. 655, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-jones-ala-1939.