Maryland Casualty Co. v. John F. Rees Co.

37 N.E.2d 968, 34 Ohio Law. Abs. 485, 1941 Ohio App. LEXIS 969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maryland Casualty Co. v. John F. Rees Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ohio Law. Abs. 201
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1941·No. No 3374·Published

Opinion

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of plaintiffappellee to dismiss the appeal “for the reason that the same is not within the jurisdiction of this Court, as the order of the Common Pleas Court from which the appeal is purportedly taken is not a final order affecting any substantial right of the defendant-appellant, The John F. Rees Company”.

The question presented is, Is an order vacating a judgment of dismissal after term and reinstating the case a final order. We are or the opinion that it is. Dunlevy, Sr. et v Fidelity Ass’n. et, 32 Abs 493, and cases therein cited. See also Braden v Hoffman, 46 Oh St 639.

Motion will be overruled.

GEIGER, PJ., BARNES and HORN-BECK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maryland Casualty Co. v. John F. Rees Co., 37 N.E.2d 968, 34 Ohio Law. Abs. 485, 1941 Ohio App. LEXIS 969 (Ohio Ct. App. 1941).

37 N.E.2d 968 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. John F. Rees Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunlevy v. Fidelity Ass'n
32 Ohio Law. Abs. 493 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1940)