Maryland Casualty Co. v. Davis

190 A. 178, 125 Pa. Super. 97, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 14
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 15, 1936
DocketAppeal, 436
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 A. 178 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Davis, 190 A. 178, 125 Pa. Super. 97, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 14 (Pa. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below *98 discharging a rule to strike off a judgment entered against the garnishee in an attachment execution.

Plaintiff, having a judgment against Hannah Davis and Chester T. Davis, issued an attachment execution naming Burton Davis, administrator of the estate of Jesse B. Davis, deceased, as garnishee. A default judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the garnishee in the amount of $1,003.60 “for failure to answer the interrogatories under oath within twenty days after service thereof.”

The facts in this case are the same as in Globe & Republic Insurance Company v. Davis, 125 Pa. Superior Ct. 91,190 A. 175, and involve the same questions. What we there said applies to the facts and questions raised in this case.

Judgment is reversed, and the rule to strike off is made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dwyer v. Mayer
26 Pa. D. & C.3d 401 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 A. 178, 125 Pa. Super. 97, 1937 Pa. Super. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-davis-pasuperct-1936.